|
JANUARY
3, 2003
NEWS ANALYSIS
Hiring
Outlook '03, Part Two
|
"Our
most forward-thinking clients realize that we're in a ceasefire in the war
for talent. They're building up their bench"
|
Here's the second part of BusinessWeek Online's third
annual utterly unscientific hiring-outlook survey of employment experts.
Following are edited comments from several of them. (See BW Online, 1/2/03, "Hiring
Outlook, Part One" for an introduction to and the first part of this
survey.)
David Nosal, co-head of the CEO practice for executive-search firm
Korn/Ferry International in Silicon Valley
I think we're seeing a pickup in activity in the industrial-products sector
and continued strong growth in life sciences. That would include medical
device, biotech, and other service providers. I'm also hopeful that we'll see
a little bit of an updraft in financial services and technology, but I think
those are going to lag the other areas that I've mentioned.
The most active high-end recruitment activity is at both the board and CEO
level. Many organizations continue to plan for succession at
the CEO level. And many organizations continue to have problems, so they will
be changing their CEOs. And many of the board participants aren't the right
board representation for these companies.
Sales positions will be in demand, especially for executive vice-presidents
and senior vice-presidents.
Ted Martin, CEO of Martin Partners, an executive-search firm in Chicago
Biotech
continues to grow. Construction related to defense and security continues to
grow. You have to add new rooms for better safekeeping of databases, for
instance. And you need to add more network security.
Engineers are in demand on the construction side. And you will have a need
for programmers on the software-security side. You have insurance growing
because of the increasing need for terrorism insurance. Energy is expected to
grow, as we're worried about global instability. Nanotechnology is going to
create jobs.
There's a need for more -- or at the very least better -- chief financial
officers. You have to make sure your CFO is up to snuff because companies
want to avoid WorldCom situations. More documentation is required now, and
more minutiae to be considered.
The bottom line is a return to longer hours and more work. The candidate may
be looking for lifestyle, while the employer, in search of profitability, is
looking for longer hours and more work. The real question in 2003 is: Who
wins the battle?
Joan Zimmerman, a partner at New York City-based financial-services and
real-estate search firm Rhodes Associates
|
|
|
|
In the financial market, hiring will depend on the stock
market itself and on the economy. If the market stabilizes and begins to
rise, you will see growing confidence. As a result, you will see firms begin
to hire. From an investment-banking standpoint, everything is dependent on
the market. I think there's a feeling that things will be somewhat better in the
second half of 2003.
Some areas will continue to see hiring activity, including investment banking
related to health care and financial institutions. If interest rates stay low
and there are still questions about credit and bankruptcies, the credit-derivative
area will remain in a growth mode. Restructurings and reorganizations will
continue to grow.
You won't see a lot of growth in the number of financial-services
professionals in 2003. What you'll see is an upgrading of quality -- to hire
one head, you fire one head.
Ken Keeley, executive director of the career-opportunities center at
Carnegie Mellon University's Graduate School of Industrial Administration in
Pittsburgh
My best guess is that across the country, most second-year [MBA] students are
facing a poor
job market. What we hear from recruiters is that most of their companies are
going to be pretty reluctant to open the purse strings.
Looking into my crystal ball, I think two of the first areas that will pop back
-- and it's only because they're so bad right now -- are high-tech manufacturing
and consulting. To go from zero to anything is a great improvement.
The consulting firms that recruited here [most recently] were Bain, Booz
Allen, and McKinsey. The only other group was PricewaterhouseCoopers. This is
a place where you would typically get a broader segment. We used to get a lot
of niche firms like DiamondCluster and A.T. Kearney. Those firms aren't
recruiting right now.
The two groups of students we think are having the biggest challenges are
career changers and international students. When supply exceeds demand,
employers are less willing to train career changers and less willing to go to
battle with the government to get an international student [a work visa].
Randy Neal, managing partner at the Broadmoor Group, an executive-search
firm in Dallas
We've seen a tremendous increase in executive-level search
assignments in the last 45 days -- at least a 100% increase over last year.
I'm assuming that there's more optimism out there. The industries that we're
seeing activity in include building supplies, certain segments of information
technology, especially in the data-storage area. We're also getting more
board searches. Biotech is another hot area. In telecommunications, wireless
is seeing some growth.

A lot of jobs are sales jobs. You're going to have more sales and development
positions as businesses upgrade their sales forces. A lot of the jobs are for
the top executives in an organization. Companies are also upgrading management.
Clearly, the trend is for people who are more proven -- people who have been
there, done that. Salaries, meanwhile, are pretty flat. They're not jumping
ahead.
Bob Lambert, a managing partner in Irvine, Calif., with Christian
& Timbers, an
executive-search firm
What we're seeing is a very
minor uptick in requests for our services as we go into the first quarter.
There's still a very high level of uncertainty about where the economy is
going. Optimism is being mitigated by the possibility of war in the Mideast.
Our most forward-thinking clients realize that we're in a ceasefire in the
war for talent. They're building up their bench.
A lot of our demand is for the been-there-done-that executives -- those in
their mid 40s to early 50s with 20-plus years of operational and
execution-oriented experience. Right now, the demand is for people who can
make things happen, not for people who can provide visions. What matters is
what you can do for me in the next quarter.
I place a lot of senior-level human resources executives. Some potential
candidates lose sight of the basics in HR. There's a demand for people who
have built a talent-acquisition and management process that gets their
companies the best people and who have developed rewards systems that work.
The hot job right now is chairman of the audit committee for a board. I'm doing two of those searches. It's
basic. CEOs have to sign off on financial statements, so they want an
audit-committee chairman they can trust.
Mary Albright-Smith, director of career management at UCLA's Anderson
School
For the kind of recruiters that tend to do hiring on campus for investment
banking, consulting, and marketing, we're seeing hiring pretty flat compared
with last year. We're not hearing them talk about it picking up, either.

Those [students] who weren't recruited on campus are looking at biotech. I
think that we're also going to see an increase in hiring by entertainment
companies. It isn't explosive growth, but it's increasing. Slowly but surely,
the industry is paying more attention to MBAs. And as more MBAs get into the
industry, it opens up to future MBAs simply because of networking.
|